Thanks so much Madeleine for the info!
I read both documents, but I don't see any evidence that teacher quality is more important that socio-economic status. The Education Trust document doesn't discuss socio-economic status at all. There is data that the Harlem Childrens Zone school students have test scores comparable to white students, but that was in a school where, according to page 16, students spent twice as much time in school than comparable students. Also, isn't it true that most of the efforts of the HCZ are in areas other than teacher quality?
Does anyone else know where this might be documented?
Thanks!
Message Board
Post any thoughts you have on public education, education reform, the President's education policies, or what you would like to see change in education.
Efrain Martinez
January 26, 2010 8:00 PM
To frame the issue, I reccomend you check out the chapter entitled "Most Likely to Succeed" in Malcom Gladwell's book, What The Dog Saw. In fact, his book Outliers also sheds light on this issue. It is not that socioecnomic status is not a vital issue. In fact, it is the issue that presents the most difficult challenge when teaching so that all children learn to high standards. The point is that research finds that effective teaching does overcome environmental issues such as socioeconomic background.
teacher
January 27, 2010 7:18 PM
Efrain Martinez,
Thanks for your suggestions. Can you point me to the research that "finds that effective teaching does overcome environmental issues such as socioeconomic background"?
Thanks for your suggestions. Can you point me to the research that "finds that effective teaching does overcome environmental issues such as socioeconomic background"?
parent
June 6, 2010 2:07 AM
Whether or not teacher quality is more important than socio-economic status is an important question. If teacher quality has little or no impact on outcomes for students, but socio-economic status does, we should spend little or no money on education, and instead direct the money to the families to raise their socio-economic status. One who suggests that teacher quality has little or no impact on outcomes for students is really saying that teachers are no more than day care providers. If that is the case, they should be paid as day care providers, and we don't need extensive adminstation and overhead to administer a day care center. Teachers have made a difference in my life, and my unscientific survey of one says teacher quality is much more important than socio-economic status. As a result, I believe we should compensate teachers as if they are more important, and demand results.
January 20, 2010 8:52 PM
Democrats for Education Reform report: NY Belches in RTTT Competition:
http://www.dfer.org/2010/01/new_york_belche.php#more
http://www.dfer.org/2010/01/new_york_belche.php#more
January 19, 2010 7:16 PM
New Film to Spotlight Fight over NYC Schools
http://newsblaze.com/story/2010011910570900001.bw/topstory.html
http://newsblaze.com/story/2010011910570900001.bw/topstory.html
January 19, 2010 5:26 PM
Mayor Bloomberg rips charter school bill for insulting Martin Luther King, but signs off on it
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/education/2010/01/19/2010-01-19_charter_bill_an_insult_to_mlk_sez_mike__then_signs_off_on_it.html#ixzz0d52CDJ0f
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/education/2010/01/19/2010-01-19_charter_bill_an_insult_to_mlk_sez_mike__then_signs_off_on_it.html#ixzz0d52CDJ0f
January 19, 2010 3:27 PM
NYC loses millions of dollars for education:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/19/nyregion/19charter.html?ref=nyregion
/>
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703626604575011391417058952.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/19/nyregion/19charter.html?ref=nyregion
/>
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703626604575011391417058952.html